syndication

rss feed

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Freeverse SoundStudio 3

http://www.freeverse.com
Score:

SoundStudio 3 is a sound editor with relatively powerful features, a simple interface and a no-frills approach. If you want to create simple podcasts without much effort and without the addition of video, SoundStudio may prove to be faster to work with than SoundTrack Pro. However, if sophistication is what’s you’re after, Apple SoundTrack Pro may be better suited than SoundStudio. Price wise, SoundStudio can’t be beaten, though.

When you launch SoundStudio 3, the first thing that jumps right at you, is its simple interface. You’ll be greeted by a track window, and an input levels window, and that’s it. SoundStudio is not meant to capture sound from whatever sound source your Mac can access (including system sounds, and Internet radio). It’s no competition of WireTap, but it can process sound from input devices like microphones and CDs.

SoundStudio 3 has sound filters and effects that compete with professional versions but which haven’t been “packaged” in as enticing design as Apple’s Audio Units in SoundTrack Pro or Logic Pro’s software sound generators. It’s all much more plain and down-to-earth, but it does the job. My hearing isn’t what it used to be, but I could hardly hear a difference between some of SoundStudio’s effects and the identical effects available to you in SoundTrack Pro.

Good Quality Sound Output

Only the more complex effects like what Apple’s Space Designer is capable of, makes a huge difference. If you try to create the same effects with SoundStudio 3, you’ll soon discover it simply can’t be done. The question is whether SoundStudio users will need or want that level of sophisticated effects.

On the other hand, SoundStudio does come with features that you need to create good sound files. For example, there is a Tone Generator available that has the easiest interface I’ve ever seen: it looks like a piano keyboard and has settings for the note and tuning characteristics. SoundStudio also has full support for metadata --such as the sort of information you’ll want to add to MP3 files. And it has some sound analysis functionality as well; the Fourier Spectrum Analysis filter, for example.

My impression is that SoundStudio 3 is more aimed at people who want to digitise a collection of LP records with a minimum of fuss and a maximum of sound quality. Although SoundTrack Pro would be better for them in terms of fixing records with a loss of hiss and hum almost automatically, you can do it quite well with SoundStudio 3 too.

The other group of SoundStudio 3 users are in my view podcasters who want to get their message out as quickly as they can. For them, SoundStudio 3 has enough effects and filters to create a clean and comfortable hearing experience without all the extra functionality SoundTrack Pro delivers, and which they’ll never need.

Focus on XML publishing

XML enables InDesign and QuarkXPress users to re-purpose content for use on the web, smart phones, PDAs, etc.

Focus on layout conversion

We covered the software to convert InDesign files into QuarkXPress and vice versa without the need for manually cleaning up a mess.

Quark job jackets

Quark Job Jackets are an innovative technology. We created a Basic and Advanced Training Pack to learn using them.

Comment Form

Time of Entry: 2008 02 13 UT - by Ron Evry

Not only does Sound Studio make a great Podcast sound editor, but its simple interface makes it incredibly easy to teach school kids with. Compared with programs like Audacity or even Garage Band, it is flat out obvious how it works, and kids from second grade on up have no trouble understanding the interface.

All comments are moderated

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify of follow-up comments?

tracker

IT Enquirer © Erik Vlietinck; 1999 - 2008 | All Rights Reserved
The full Copyright Statement can be found in the About page

All requests for licensing, reprints, linking and other usage of material on IT Enquirer should be addressed to the publisher via e-mail at webmaster [at] it-enquirer dot com. We will review your request, and provide you with an approval or rejection as soon as possible. We will attempt to approve or disapprove within 24 hours.

published with a Mac

Powered by
ExpressionEngine

About Articles ListBook ListGlossaryAdvertiseContent Access LevelsMedia Calendarprivacy statementterms of userefund policy