syndication

rss feed

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Leopard’s Font Book Makes Third-Party Tools Obsolete For Some


Score:

Font Book has long been Mac OS X’s least attractive application. It made a market for third party developers such as Extensis and Insider Software. Even Linotype released its own excellent font organiser and offers it for free. But Leopard’s Font Book is no longer the weakest link in the font management chain. It has been updated with features such as Auto-Activation. Throw away those third-party font organisers!

If you need powerful management outside the Leopard system Libraries, you won’t find Font Book a good replacement for your copy of Suitcase or FontAgent. Active fonts still live in one of the Libraries on your Leopard system, wen using Font Book. But the good news is that you can turn these fonts on and off as required.

Inactive fonts are not kept inside any library at all. They just sit idle in your fonts folder, ready to be used whenever you’re ready. With only active fonts being dumped into the Fonts folder inside the Library folder, you do have to keep your fonts folder somewhere on your system. As soon as you remove the fonts from the system, Font Book won’t be able to find them.

Font Auto-Activation

It will, however, keep the references to them so that, whenever the folder is restored, the fonts and your preferences related to them are restored as well. Font Book now has a great preview panel, where you can see the font preview, but also the metadata pertaining to each font. And you can validate fonts, and throw out duplicates.

I found the validation feature to be the least stable, making Font Book crash on occasion. But after a crash Font Book launched with all my changes applied, so there must be some auto-save functionality built-in. Auto-activation seems to work with all the applications that can make good use of it, including QuarkXPess and InDesign.

Fonts can be exported, multiple libraries and collections can be created, and font collections or individual fonts can be set on or off. Printing fonts can be done in catalogue, waterfall or repertoire format, with or without font information on the page.

So, does Font Book face up to the competition with Extensis Suitcase Fusion or one of the other professional font managers? Well, it depends. On an individual user level, I would say you don’t need a third-party font manager anymore. Wen you’re working in a design department, where fonts are often kept on servers, it’s a whole different story. 

And when you need “collect for output” capabilities for a layout document with automatic save from within the font manager, chances are that you will prefer to stick with Extensis’, Linotype’s or Insider’s tool anyway.

Focus on XML publishing

XML enables InDesign and QuarkXPress users to re-purpose content for use on the web, smart phones, PDAs, etc.

Focus on layout conversion

We covered the software to convert InDesign files into QuarkXPress and vice versa without the need for manually cleaning up a mess.

Quark job jackets

Quark Job Jackets are an innovative technology. We created a Basic and Advanced Training Pack to learn using them.

Comment Form

Time of Entry: 2007 11 13 UT - by lantzn

I haven’t upgraded to Leopard yet, I’m still running Tiger.  I’m curious how does Leopard’s Font Book stack up to the free Linotype FontExplorer X?  I love this program and have used it for a few years now.

Time of Entry: 2007 11 19 UT - by Almir Germano

Well, after upgrading to Leopard, FontExplorer X did not succeeded on updating the library ("Uncaught system exception: signal 11” cryptic error all the time...), so I dumped it for the moment, no answer in the Linotype forums yet, so… since you are a Pro (wich I’m not), I suggest you to keep with Tiger, since I think FontExplorer X is way better than FontBook (even the Leopard one) on managing a huge Font collection. Waiting for some light down here…

Time of Entry: 2007 12 03 UT - by david

Font Book is great but falls short in one key area, which is font comparison. It’s impossible to compare multiple fonts side by side or in a list, something Font Explorer X excels at.

I finally had a response to my mail to linotype regarding compatibility with Leopard. This was their response:

In general Linotype FontExplorer X, current version 1.2.2 is compatible with Leopard, but not with version 1.1.2. We are aware of one system related bug and we hope to fix it soon.

Time of Entry: 2008 01 09 UT - by Simon

You should contact Linotype about this problem. I’ve contacted them several times, and they have excellent help. They absolutely do listen to the users. And all this for a free app. I’ve been using FontExplorerX just about since it came out. I have Tiger on my machine here at work, but I have Leopard on my home laptop. I haven’t tried Font Book in Leopard, but I have used FEX and didn’t have any problems. I did do a clean install though on the laptop, so maybe there’s a problem with upgrading. Anyway, good luck.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

tracker

IT Enquirer © Erik Vlietinck; 1999 - 2008 | All Rights Reserved
The full Copyright Statement can be found in the About page

All requests for licensing, reprints, linking and other usage of material on IT Enquirer should be addressed to the publisher via e-mail at webmaster [at] it-enquirer dot com. We will review your request, and provide you with an approval or rejection as soon as possible. We will attempt to approve or disapprove within 24 hours.

published with a Mac

Powered by
ExpressionEngine

About Articles ListBook ListGlossaryAdvertiseContent Access LevelsMedia Calendarprivacy statementterms of userefund policy