Keynote 2: Competition to PowerPoint?
Product Data
Pros: 0
Contras:
Link:
Score: " alt="score" />
Share This Story
Delve Deeper Into This Story
Screenshots For This Story
by: Erik Vlietinck - Last Updated: Sat 05 March 2005
Microsoft’s PowerPoint may not be perfect, but it is without a doubt the industry standard when it comes to presentation software. There’s little else that comes near PowerPoint in terms of features and tools for presenters. But PowerPoint is a bit dull on the outside. It lacks the refinement of Keynote, a typical Apple product. We compared the two programs.
PowerPoint is part of Microsoft Office. It is integrated with Excel and Word. Why is it then, that Excel is not automatically opened when you want to add chart data and charts to a PowerPoint presentation? Instead, you get a data editor with very limited capabilities for importing your data. Probably some hard to understand programming logic that Microsoft has patented.
But it does work, and charts and diagrams can easily be added to a PowerPoint slide. The data editor even understands importing CSV files and of course native Excel files. Although the PowerPoint Gallery has less stunning designs, they are immediately usable for someone on a tight schedule. If you want to create a presentation fast, without much thought about design details, PowerPoint is an obvious first choice.
Giving presentations with PowerPoint is easy and efficient too, with a number of tools to make presenting slides a no-brainer. There’s a timer, on-screen buttons, and all sorts of aides for the presenter. Also, PowerPoint works with a number of toys that make presenting fun, like the Logitech Cordless 2.4 GHz Presenter.
Fast and reasonably good-looking, that seems to be PowerPoint’s strongest selling point.
Keynote, the looks
Keynote, and certainly Keynote 2, is conceived on a different basis. Keynote doesn’t so much focus on creating something fast, but on creating something pleasing to the eye. Keynote presentations can be fashionable, extremely good looking with lots of eye candy. Keynote 1 lacked a number of necessary features for professional presenters, but version 2 is much more robust in that area as well.
Keynote has a better interface than PowerPoint. The latter overwhelms, even with dimmed palettes. Keynote doesn’t overwhelm, by leaving out a few palettes that you can activate from menus and using keyboard short cuts. Keynote’s Inspector palette is well designed, with all the elements in the right places, making it easy for even an amateur presenter to find his/her way through the features.
Keynote shines in supporting designers. PowerPoint templates can be quite powerful, but reality dictates that all PowerPoint presentations are somewhat uniform by design. If you have ever seen a presentation given by a marketing manager at IBM, Lotus, Microsoft, or Oracle, you know what I’m talking about. The logo goes in the upper left corner, the heading at the top, dead center. Transitions are limited to sliding text from the left or the right, and that’s about it.
PowerPoint does enable these people to be more creative, but the tools are more hidden than with Keynote. Keynote almost forces you to be creative. Keynote templates, like the professional ones created by some companies like Keynote Theme Park and Keynote Pro, are usually gems in terms of originality and looks.
Keynote users’ eyes won’t glaze at terms like “alpha channel” and “gradient mask”, PowerPoint users’ will.
Keynote, what’s new
In version 2, Keynote has become more mature. It’s not just looks anymore, it’s about creating efficient presentations and presenting them in a professional manner.
Share your Views
IT Enquirer welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. You are solely responsible for all content you post to the site. Libel, copyright and trade mark infringement, links to commercial websites, products, or sales materials, and offensive or threatening language are not permitted and may be removed based on our terms and conditions of use. Your pen name will appear alongside any comments that you post.
You must be logged in to post.
Readers' Views
A couple of things:
1.
you state it is harder to put other content into keynote if they are not handled by the media palate. Huh?
First, consider that you can drag and drop almost any file onto keynote and it imports it. You can use native photoshop (with alpha channel support!), Illustrator, PDF - you name it! That alone makes it massively better than PP.
As a import workflow (when media is not in the media palate), try this: turn on expose, set the top right corner of your screen to activate Show all apps, and the lower right to show the desktop. Now, when you need to import somthing, simply mouse up to the upper or lower right corner activating expose, click the window or app that has your file, select it, drag over to the corner again, drop it onto keynote! It is SO easy to move info around with expose! It kills me using my PC now because I am so much faster as a result of expose. try it!
2.
In PP I never ever over the past 12 years of using it have been able to really control or figure out how to use master pages. In keynote, it is so easy! And once you learn how to do it, it is so easy to work with your media and change slides from one master to anther with little pain.
3.
The new presentation window with side by side current and next slide, with notes - come on - that is brilliant!
4.
I highly recommend Salling Clicker for those who have bluetooth mobile phones. I gave a presentation from my PowerBook recently using Salling clicker and my SonyEricsson to control it - fantastic. No one could figure out how I was controlling the slides
)
In my opinion and experience, the pleasure of creating a keynote presentation is second only to presenting with it. Since version 2, I think there is no comparison between the PowerPoint and Keynote any more. Keynote wins flat out.
By lounge on 2005 03 06

Email this story




